Not so sure about the twin thing but that's probably because these days it's hard to imagine they'd freeze actual babies rather than embryos. So they might have shared a fallopian tube but not a womb, would that be enough to count as twins more than siblings?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2005-08-08 04:02 pm (UTC)Not so sure about the twin thing but that's probably because these days it's hard to imagine they'd freeze actual babies rather than embryos. So they might have shared a fallopian tube but not a womb, would that be enough to count as twins more than siblings?